There were several reasons why the Industrial Revolution started in Great Britain rather than in France, the other great powers of the day. In the first place, Britain had the money necessary to finance the larger enterprises. England's supremacy on the seas had encouraged commerce, and Englishmen had been amassing wealth through there commerce and industry. The newly rich class in that country were not the aristocratic group, but merchants and businessmen who were willing to devote themselves to industry and scientific agriculture. The wealth of France, on the other hand, was largely in the hands of the nobility, and they were not willing to do the necessary work to develop industry. In the second place, Great Britain had undertaken very early the manufacturing of inexpensive and more practical products for which there would be ever-growing demand from the people, especially the new middle class. On the other hard, France produced articles in the luxury class. These could never be turned out in quantities because they demanded individuality. England was the producer of goods that were produced in quantities, and if she could find a cheaper means of producing them, her markets would grow. So she was ready for methods that would make it possible to manufacture in large quantities. In the third place, for a long time England had large numbers of semiskilled workers. When the feudal system broke down in England and the manors were turned to sheep raising, numbers of Englishmen went to the towns. There they engaged in weaving, making shows, wood carving and many other occupations that developed skills. When the industrial revolution began, these men were available for the work on the new machines. Moreover they were free men who could move from place to place as the need for workers arose. This had not been the case in France, which was still chiefly an agricultural country with peasants bound to their masters in many ways so they could not easily move to the cities. In the fourth place, coal was abundant in Great Britain, and a large amount of this cheap fuel was necessary for ruing the factories. There was coal in northern France, too, but France was late in tapping such resources because really everyone depended directly or indirectly on farming for his living.

　　1. Britain had the money necessary to develop industry because _____.

　　[A] Britain was much wealthier than France at that time

　　[B] Britain government encouraged the development of industry

　　[C] The merchants and businessmen were willing to fiancee the industry

　　[D] The aristocratic group was willing to develop the industry

　　2. According to the passage, French people attached importance to _____.

　　[A] the quantities of the articles

　　[B] the individuality of the articles

　　[C] the practicality of the articles

　　[D] the price of the articlesＷww.KaＯ8.CC

　　3. Which of the following statements is true?

　　[A] The wealth of France was largely in the hands of new middle class.

　　[B] French people were bound to the new machines.

　　[C] France was more likely to produce goods in qualities.

　　[D] France could not get free workers necessary to the industry.

　　4. When the industrial revolution began, Englishmen _____.

　　[A] were busy amassing wealth through commerce and industry

　　[B] had found a cheaper means of producing goods needed in qualities

　　[C] depended on farming for their living

　　[D] could move from plae to place as the need for workers arose

　　5. What can be inferred from the passage?

　　[A] The demand for luxury goods was limited.

　　[B] Industrial Revolution was the result of the interaction of various factors.

　　[C] French people farming to industry and commerce.

　　[D] Coal was very important to people's life.

　　参考答案：C B D D B

　　The heritage of English law brought with it the seeds of American liberty-not the flower and the fruit, which were to be produced after long labor and painful struggle. Nevertheless, the seeds were there and they sprouted, took root and have continued to grow. To this extent, the inheritance was valuable, but it is not to be denied that even though English law gave us the seeds of liberty, it also imposed upon us a vast amount of useless lumber that we have not swept away entirely --- after three hundred years of unceasing effort. Even the system of trial by jury, in spite of its enormous value, came to us with burdensome, outworn ideas and unnecessary precautions, on the one hand, and with no adequate means of adaptation to changing conditions, on the other. For one thing, in the early days it was assumed that ignorance of the facts was a guarantee of a juror's impartiality. At that time, when means of communication were few and slow, there was something to be said for the idea; but today, when means of communication were abundant and almost instantaneous, ignorance of the facts is evidence, not of impartiality, but of extraordinary stupidity, or of extraordinary indifference. The rule that a juror must be ignorant of the facts is, therefore, a rule that operates against, not for the effort to fill the jury box with honest men of ordinary intelligence. It has become so hopeless, indeed, that the courts literally ceased long ago trying to enforce it. It is, nevertheless, still a theoretical part of the system.

　　1 The passage is main about _____.

　　[A] the seeds of American literty

　　[B] the system of trial by jury

　　[C] a theoretical weakness of the jury system

　　[D] the changing conditions in the jury system

　　2. The inheritance of English law brought with it _____.

　　[A] the seeds of American literty

　　[B] the flower and fruit of American literty

　　[C] some ideas and precautions which were useless

　　[D] both A and C

　　3. The assumption that ignorance of the facts was a guarantee of a juror's impartiality _____.

　　[A] was reasonable neither in the past nor at present

　　[B] was extraordinary stupid or indifferent

　　[C] is not valid under the changing conditions

　　[D] has been proved reasonable

　　4. The rule that a juror must be ignorant of the facts is _____.

　　[A] no longer a theoretical part of the system

　　[B] no longer strictly enforced

　　[C] against the theoretical basis

　　[D] still strictly enfore

　　5. Which of the following statements is true?

　　[A] The rules of the trial system should be more flexible to adapt to the changing conditions.

　　[B] The members of the jury should be of extraordinary intelligance.

　　[C] Ignorance of the facts on the part of a juror today is evidence of impartiality.

　　[D] When means of communication had proved abundant,there was nothing to be said for the idea.

　　参考答案：C D C B A